Quote:
|
Originally Posted by indago
Jerry Pitts wrote:
It is noted, in the Senate Document No. 43: "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State".
This is a communist doctrine. Do you accept this as valid in the United States?
|
Don't even go there Indago. Of course I do not agree with the communist doctrine. On the other hand, because it is written into Congressional record, it is a FACT, and a FACT that we as American men and women should not be proud of (giving respect to the tens of thousands that have died in the fight to keep this nation the property of the men and women of this nation).
A conquered nation is a conquered nation; yet that alone, does not mandate that the men and women of that conquered nation must of necessity sit back and allow the attributes of being conquered to continue in its' sick charade.
If you keep in context of what I stated, you will find that all I am promoting is the concept of 'fighting fire with fire', 'using their own words against them', 'keeping your friends close, but keeping your enemies closer'. In other words, if they desire to 'claim' all property as their own, then make them likewise and in accordance with their law, responsible for that property.
You have chosen to use the term 'valid' in your question. Please define the term 'valid'. It is valid in the sense that it is a FACT of history, but not necessarily 'valid' in the sense of being 'lawful'.
Jerry Carlos