View Single Post
  #2  
Old 04-11-2008, 02:25 AM
Lawdog Lawdog is online now
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 632
correction

Correction:

They have on occasion, for rhetorical purposes, referenced their BELIEF in the existence of God.

If an Indian court referenced the Hindu gods Shiva or Vishnu, would you take that as "proof" that those gods exist?

Beliefs, remember, are not the same as facts.

If any philosopher wrote a book that proved the existence or non-existence of God, he or she would surely win the Nobel Prize for Literature for solving such an ancient debate.

I personally believe in God, a higher power, whatever you want to call it. However, I am aware that my belief is not proof. That you are not calls into question the extent of your intellectual development.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote