|
don't make me laugh
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by trooper2ls
An insider from the FBI that I used to do computer work for told me a few months back that they were going to be creating a category in their national database for state sovrans. This way in an encounter with the law you would simply give your true name and status and upon lookup they would simply apologize for the inconvience and you would be on your way. (Of course barring you didn't just kill somebody or something like that...)
..J
|
What's a "sovran"? Is that anything like a "sovereign"?
Anyway, there's enough baloney in this post to open your own deli. No court has ever accepted the "sovereign citizen" movement theories. Ever. Not even one. No way in hell would the FBI fall for a bunch of bumcombe like that.
You really need to learn to keep your lies at least plausible, you know.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|