At-law BAR Association closed-shop brothels are hardly Constitutional republican courts of law.
Is the "judge" "the court?"
Quote:
A republican form of government means a republic.
In a republic the administration of affairs is open to all CITIZENS©.
A court is a republican institution where affairs are administered.
You must administer your affairs of court yourself or waive this right.
MOST PEOPLE, myself included, thought that John signed the Great Charter of English Liberties and became good King John afterwards.
This is wrong.
As soon as John got the rebel barons to disband their armies he waged holy war against them for the rest of his life.
OUR CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA must be defended and we must defend it to the best of our ability.
When you invoke a court you must assert your jurisdiction to hold it and cannot let the judge usurp your judicial power.
This means you do not pay an attorney fee to him to conduct your court, you do not submit documents to him for his approval, you do not motion him to move your court, you deny everything he has tried to file and you strike anything that he has attempted to enter of record.
He will not like you.
You are not trying to make friends with him.
Without the judge you can eject attorneys and enter your own orders including a declaratory judgment if no other party appears for court in person.
If a few of us do this we can be hunted down and exterminated.
If thousands of us do this it may succeed.
I'm telling you how to fight but not promising victory.
|
You actually insist that people "cite" "court" "cases" as validation of law, my boy?
How many of lawdog's beloved "court" "cases" have included, at center stage, a "judge" whose "salary" is "paid" by the "plaintiff?"
How many of lawdog's beloved "court" "cases" have a prosecuting "attorney," and "judge" whose "salary" are "paid" by the "plaintiff?"
How many of lawdog's beloved "court" "cases" have included a prosecuting "attorney," a "judge," and a "defense" "attorney" whose "salary" are "paid" by the "plaintiff?"
How many of lawdog's beloved "court" "cases" have included a prosecuting "attorney," a "judge," and a "defense" "attorney" whose "salary" are not only "paid" by the "plaintiff," but all belong to the same private monopoly for-profit trade guild, that presumes to give them all "license" to "practice" [at] "law?"
Is lawdog's first legal concern lawdog's client, or lawdog's "court?"
Your dog and pony show (donkey and court-e-san show) "courts" are meaningless, irrelevant, deceitful gaming casinos, at best.
They are slave markets, brothels, killing floors, and dung heaps at worst.
Live it up, my boy.
Try the ribs, son, I hear they are the best!
Here come da judge, here come da judge!
OYEZ, OYEZ, OYEZ!
All Rise!!
Here come da judge, kiddo!