View Single Post
  #13  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:00 AM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 631
arguments?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
Don't take mrg personally. That seems to be his usual argument. Something reminiscent of the old radio show about the adventures of Baron Munchausen.

It's worth keeping in mind (1) Dave the Jailbird (and others) only show bits of arguments from cases without telling us the judge's decision or how to get it -- strong evidence by itself that the decision was against them, and (2) MRG has yet to back up his own claims with any precedents, and he seems incapable (I don't know if it's pure laziness or combined with dementia) of looking up precedents that I have cited; he doesn't bother looking them up so he acts as if I haven't cited them.

Actually, Shoonra, I can't offhand remember mrg (aka mindlessly repeating gibberish) making any real legal arguments as such. Mainly he engages in his pathological hatred and/or fear of lawyers, much as some people have a pathological hatred and/or fear of Jews, blacks, Freemasons, etc.

The depth of his delusions is apparent when you observe that he still clings to the long-discredited notion that the term "bar" as applied to lawyers is actually "BAR," an acronym for "British Accredited Registry" or something along those lines. Although I have posted a link to the attorney's oath for my state, which clearly shows that there is nothing in the oath indicating fealty to the English crown, or indeed any entities other than the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Georgia, he persists in his delusion that lawyers are somehow agents of the British government.

I guess when you've drunk enough of the Kool-Aid, old delusions die hard.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote