[David Merrill]

Dear Mrg;

We suitors are too ugly to come out right in photographs - see attached assize.

Originally Posted by TheIntelCritic

I also have another tidbit to throw into the fray:

My name is copyrighted.

I have debated putting the credit reporting agencies on notice not to use my copy righted name.

If I put them on notice, I wonder what the ramifications will be? Will ALL of my credit history go up in smoke? The good and the bad?

I wonder.

You cannot bill them for using a legal or full name that you gave them. There is confusion about your name.

The attorners in black robes will not comment on breaching the close - going outside the artificial realm. The two cases sanitized in the DoJ motion attached are people who never contacted me - they just proceeded in their legal or full names without understanding the Strawman conditioning you have been victimized by yourself. The names of the cases were obviously family nomens like Deitemeyer or Saunderman etc...

Since the magistrates needed not admit to any false branding, they must have jumped on the opportunity to slur otherwise fine process. But here is what the Motion was really about; a contract offer to pretty please Suitor allow the US to come to the private Fed corporate agent's rescue? Attached Page 4.* The Suitor wisely Refused for Cause timely.

I am not spending much time explaining all this again but the whole common law applied in any court is about the authority to instruct the clerk. (attached clerk instruction) An assize Instructed the removal of Bruce Clyde's matter and of course included no filing fee - being the superior court. So the justices interpreted that as a motion to proceed as a pauper - In Forma Pauperis. - Which is to say the entire opinion is only the last sentence of this one they gave...

http://www.ck10.uscourts.gov/opinions/06/06-6238.pdf

The Lawdog jackal mentality got the better of them though... And I appreciate Mrg's photojournalism of attorneys. It is just that more explanation about the mechanics is required. This suitor just called and is sending me a nice gratuity for some work on this topic.

Hello David,

Do you have a template for a clerk instruction letter to remove a case from the state- -county superior court to the district court ? Does it eliminate the case and what the court / county did ?

Thanks...

P.S. Whoops almost forgot; I just spent over 2 hours talking with a friend that knew Jerome Daly. Evidently he lived out his last years here in California.

by: True Name: Expressly Reserving All Rights and Liberties.

"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God." - Thomas Jefferson

And all the referrals from Shoonra and Lawdog, while I appreciate them are too much overhead compared to jealous friends and family of extant suitors. But you can still PM me and I will consider speaking with you about remedy. Most of the material is here if you want to click my Bio and go through a lot of my posts.

Thanks again Shoonra! And Lawdog; since you are on my IgnoreList let me just say that I agree with Mrg - you are a jackal.


Regards,

David Merrill.


* The Fed is a private corporation and the DoJ is hoping the Suitor will allow the US to come to the IRS agent's rescue:

“one-half of its capital stock . . .” of the respondents/Libelants Principal, the Fund and Bank. 28 USC §1349; The government by becoming a corporator, (See 28 USC §3002(15(A)(B)(C), 22 USCA 286(e)) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 5 L.Ed. (Wheat) 244; U.S. v. Butt, 309 U.S. 242). The REAL PARTY OF INTEREST is not the de jure “United States of America” or “State”, but “The Bank” and “The Fund”. (22 USCA 286, et. seq.). The acts committed under fraud, force and seizure are many times done under “Letters of Marque and Reprisal” i.e., “recapture.” (See 31 USCA §5323). Such principles as “Fraud and Justice never dwell together, Wingate’s Maxims 680, and “A right of action cannot arise out of fraud.” Brown’s Maxims 297, 729.