View Single Post
  #18  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:44 AM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
Much to your dismay, there are many people who see the sham that you are distributing to the many viewers of this forum. Those people, realizing the difference between truth and falsehood, choose to elect the preference of truth. Therefore, your continued attacks on people who are presenting the truth, only encourages those people to seek out the counsel of those providing 'truth'. Subsequently, you are in effect making referrals to DiM (David Merrill) without even being conscious of the acts you are committing. I would also like to thank you for making those referrals, as the more people there are that are reading the truth, the less there are that are reading falsehood and mis-representations.

Have a nice day.

Jerry Carlos

Whatever you say, boy.

The TRUTH, which is easily verifiable in the public record, is that DiM has spent time in jail, including at least one occasion when he was convicted by a jury of his peers. On another occasion, a federal judge threw out a lawsuit he filed exactly one day after he filed it with the memorable comment that it was a "rambling, nonsensical, incoherent blotch on this court's docket."

See this link:http://www.trial.com/Blogger/2001_08...logarchive.htm

Have I won all my cases? Of course not, no lawyer wins them all. But has a judge ever called me nuts, as Judge Nottingham did when he tossed DiM's suit? No.

You follow DiM's theories at your severe peril. I just hope you don't end up serving time like he did.

Good luck, son. Something tells me you're going to need it.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote