|
nah....
Did mrg (short for mindlessly repeating gibberish) address me directly, again?
Nah, I must be imagining things.
After all, while refuting his nonsense for about the twentieth time a few weeks back, I did include this statement:
Quote:
|
Since this is the last time I plan to address you directly, mrg, you being not worthy of serious attention, let me make some things clear.
|
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/taxati...tml#post134198
Yeah. Must be imagining things.
Again.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|