Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dorkenbutt
When they do not want to answer with substance (truth) just declare it frivolous, or merely state you're a nutjob or somehow loony. Quatloser types are good at that. It's what keeps them in business. Heck, truth be known the shysters would be out of business.
|
If even half of the imbecilic legal theories posted on Sui Juris were valid, lawyers would make a fortune using them. But the plain fact is, they don't work for a very simple reason: they have no basis in the law but are instead the products of misguided people who think that just because they can read a legal dictionary they are somehow experts on the law. And when asked why no court or legal scholar agrees with them, and why people who have tried to use these absurd theories get slammed by the courts, the paranoid response is automatic: "It's the corrupt system."
So go ahead and file UCC-1's against the judge. Go ahead and write "Refused for Cause" on the summons issued in a lawsuit filed against you. Go ahead and type "all rights reserved" on your toilet paper. Heck, go ahead and hop up and down on one foot on your credit card bill while spelling "Rumpelstiltskin" backwards. They're all equally effective.