Quote:
|
Originally Posted by robhalford88
No, they aren't binding, but you know damn well that they can be used as persuasive argument. After all, that IS how the doctrine of Stare Decisis works, isn't it?
AND, how do you know that they aren't law in that area? Have they been used as sources and accepted in a case before?
You assume a lot, but provide little of value. Even shoonra can shine once in a while.
Demean and insult now, for your time is coming, as it is for all those who tread on us, the real living men and women.
As for the second part, OH NO, they named the wrong org. They are correct in their statements, just named the wrong org. How downright rude, better hang em.
|
First of all, in the real world, a judge (especially a state court judge) is highly unlikely to give a s**t what the law is in some other jurisdiction on ANY given topic. I would only bother citing to some other state's law if I could not find any given cases on point. Otherwise, I could talk myself blue in the face on the jurisprudence of the other 49 states, but at the end of it, the judge is going to say, "That's all well and good, counselor, but what's the law in Georgia?"
And you say my "time is coming"? Gee, I'm so scared. Better go make sure my guns are all loaded and ready to go. Robhalford88 and his buddies are coming for me.