Quote:
|
Originally Posted by masterduke
You need to be careful how you answer those 'assignment letters'. The debt that was 'dismissed' if not coupled with 'with prejudice'(I think?) means they could re-open that can of worms.
|
I think you are correct.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by masterduke
And what have they got to lose by doing that?
|
The cost of filing?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by masterduke
If they can stick you with it then its a win for them and yet another summary judgement claim.
|
This is a real concern, it is too easy to blow a procedure, and lose. It may be better to go after the DC first. See my previous post for more information.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by masterduke
I wonder if these two 'law firms' are really owned by the same creeps?
|
I get the same feeling.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by masterduke
I think your being set up to get jabbed for both of these claims. They could care less who they steal money from.
|
This is the bottomline for these bottom feeders.