[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

The second sentence is the REAL nonsense there.

Is this:

Originally Posted by Lawdog

The second sentence is the REAL nonsense there.

indeed FACT, or, perhaps OPINION, or, mere CLAIM?

Does Lawdog have a verifiable record of posting "...FACT not OPINION..." as he CLAIMS or, does LAWDOG post somewhat rhetorically convoluted OPINION ("belief") as may be illustrated in LAWDOG'S own words?

If FACT:

Can you substantiate the FACT with verifiably valid proof positive?

If not, why not?

Will you substantiate the FACT with verifiably valid proof positive?

If not, why not?


If this is merely your CLAIM:

Can you PROVE your CLAIM scrupulously adhering to academically prescribed and accepted process of left hemispheric higher order meta-cognitive skills through demonstrating application of comprehensively analytical prior first hand knowledge, proven and verifiably validated,demonstrating conclusive evaluative epagoge based upon the whole of the above successfully complete and impartial exercise?

If not, why not?

Will you PROVE your CLAIM scrupulously adhering to academically prescribed and accepted process of left hemispheric higher order meta-cognitive skills through demonstrating application of comprehensively analytical prior first hand knowledge, proven and verifiably validated, demonstrating conclusive evaluative epagoge based upon the whole of the above successfully complete and impartial exercise?

If not, why not?

Thus far, how, precisely is it not FACT that you have a, by now, substantial record of default, claiming that you WILL NOT respond?


How, precisely, would it not, rather be that you, in FACT cannot uprightly, straightforwardly, forthrightly, honestly, and impartially respond with integrity, nor can you afford to?