|
what do you expect?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
The problem is that mrg has already said that he doesn't regard court decisions as any sort of proof, so, for all the psychobabble about "meta-cognitive" and the like, mrg has pretty much ruled out all the accepted methods of supporting legal arguments.
Of course, mrg has yet to support his own assertions in any proper way, so it's wash.
|
Well, Shoonra, mrg (aka mindlessly repeating gibberish) appears to be a loudmouthed drunk with a thesaurus fetish. You can't really expect too much from someone like that.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|