http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKyCpCrH3cY
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
So far, the litigation brought by the WTC leasing consortium has not been against the govt but against insurance companies and now airports and airllines. The govt has not attempted to raise a secrecy privilege in thes lawsuits.
Considering that the primary evidence (films and videos of the towers before, during and after their collapse) and the so-called experts are non-governmental, it would be unlikely that the govt could successfully raise the secrecy privilege if they were brought into the litigation. In any case, it hasn't happened.
The insuance companies, even with millions of dollars at stake, did not even attempt to interpose a defense based on an inside-job theory. This is a clear indication that they were aware that, despite the enormous amount of money at issue, such a defense argument would have been totally unsuccessful, not even getting a
compromise in the claims.
|
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 (1845)]
|