|
proof
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mikah2k
Regarding "no force or effect", I have seen the credit river township decision to cancel two secured loans on two separate pieces of real estate.
A shrewd Reader would order a certified copy of the Decision and serve it as prescribed by David Merrill and observe the effects.
David, all I can say is thanks man, it worked. Since that time, no further billing statements from the bank nor any foreclosure process from the bank was seen by the homeowners and this is the third year since.
|
Proof, please. Justice of the peace court decisions have NO value binding precedent at all, even on other justice of the peace courts in the same state. No trial level court decisions ever establish precedent, in fact.
Think of it this way...let's assume that O.J. was guilty. The fact that the jury found him not guilty does not "establish a precedent" in California (or anywhere else) that it's perfectly legal to kill your ex-wife.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|