View Single Post
  #26  
Old 04-25-2008, 02:00 PM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 626
ludicrious

Quote:
Originally Posted by indio007
The thing about the attorneys that post on forums is they only give you one piece of the jigsaw puzzle. Talk to attorney and filing an answer is great is advice. It sure leaves alot out though.

The failure to disclose that being represented by an attorney waives rights by making you a ward of the court is unethical for starters.

They also leave out the most important details , such as filing a counterclaim for libel and slander and bonding the opposing side.

You should do this in every case you intend to contest.

The greatest lies are by omission.

Wow, more insanity from the peanut gallery.

1) Merely hiring an attorney does NOT make you a ward of the court, legally incompetent, or anything of that nature. That's "sovrun citizun" myth, nothing more.

2) Counterclaim for libel and slander? LOL...it's almost impossible to sue someone for defamation over statements made in pleadings. They have a strong presumption of being privileged, for reasons that are obvious if you stop to think about it for a second.

3) "Bonding" the opposing side? More "sovrun" gibberish.

You're definitely in mertensv16 category (f).
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote