Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
Lets try this test and see what happens...
The Situation
A relative has received a W2 statement in the mail accusing him of receiving about 100,000 bux of "salary", an item of gross income. His personal bank records indicate deposits in exactly these amounts on the same dates.
He says that the characterization is false, he paid for that money with equal value.
And anyway, he borrowed the money against his collateral deposit.
And besides, he was owed the money as a pre-paid credit for damages.
Further, he had a mutual assurance policy to cover his investments that paid up.
At any rate, he lent his value and was paid back with that money.
Take your pick.
What could he do to properly challenge this libelous w2 claim?
|
1) Seeing as how, from your previous posts on this forum, you appear to believe in common tax protester/tax denier myths, you wouldn't accept a legally accurate answer even if it were given.
2) I hate tax law. I told my boss before I accepted my current job that I had one rock solid condition. I told him, if you want to handle tax law, you're on your own.
For both of those reasons, I refuse to accept your "challenge."