Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Wow, more insanity from the peanut gallery.
1) Merely hiring an attorney does NOT make you a ward of the court, legally incompetent, or anything of that nature. That's "sovrun citizun" myth, nothing more.
2) Counterclaim for libel and slander? LOL...it's almost impossible to sue someone for defamation over statements made in pleadings. They have a strong presumption of being privileged, for reasons that are obvious if you stop to think about it for a second.
3) "Bonding" the opposing side? More "sovrun" gibberish.
You're definitely in mertensv16 category (f).
|
1. why do I need a representative to protect my rights unless I was incapable of doing it myself? However like I posted in another thread the attorney's first duty is to the court and public justice. The attorney is a double agent. Letting an agent with duty to a third party represent you when the conflict is with the third party speaks for itself. When You subordinate yourself to your attorney to subordinate to his master as well.
2. Who said anything about pleadings? The charges and supporting affidavit in written form as a public record added with reading them in a public forum are the libel and slander. Issuing the charges is not a pleading. It's making the record. They make an accusation that can damage your character and reputation and they make it public.The issue that makes it an open and shut case is you are not the debtor, you are the accommodation party for the debtor . Plaintiff knowingly behaves as if it is you who incurred the charge/ All the while knowing you are just guaranteeing payment of the debt.
3. Bonding is gibberish !!!! LOL, either you don't know about it or your covering up. Bonding is integral to the court system. I could bury this page in court rules and statutes explicitly referring to bonding of cases.Or maybe you are trying to get by with your BS by being technical. Does "Sufficient surety" ring a bell? As evidenced by a bond of course. Appeal bond, Appearance bonds , bail bonds, surety bonds, supersedeas bonds, indemnity bonds, special bonds, general bonds etc.. i guess those are all just patriots nonsense. I guess we should dismiss the Federal rules of Civil and Criminal procedure as patriot crap.
You can't hide it . Court is one big bonding frenzy.
Go read the clerkes praxis off of google books it would do you some good if you really don't know what's up. I suspect you do know and your not about to reveal the Achilles heel.