Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
What is missing here is attorney advice to help the accused present his position on the matter. Not your sympathies, HIS position.
|
The reason, bluntly, is that the facts are not being presented to us in a straightforward way. Instead of the simple facts, we have conclusory assertions, the conclusions being drawn up by someone who's definitely partial to one side and definitely not a lawyer.
I doubt you'll find any lawyer willing to commit to this case on the basis of the presentation you have made. My suggestion is that, instead of badmouthing the legal profession, you ought to set forth the bare facts of the situation and let the lawyer decide for himself if there had been "equal exchange", etc.
By the way, you offer a number of different conclusory assertions about the same single fact (whether there was a positive flow of income) to justify your desired outcome. In the real world, usually one and only one explanation is plenty and multiple ways of justifying the same outcome, especially when couched in this sort of strained language, make things very suspicious.