Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guesswhotoo6
Refer to the Federal court decision of 1968, Mn "the Credit River Decision" The nature of the banking transaction may well be a fraud in your case based on the UCC definition of equitable exchange between you and the bank. They got your house and your personal equity in exchange for what? Debt notes put forth as a substitute for "money". They printed the IOU notes out of thin air, and thus have nothing equitable in the loan transaction. The courts state this quite clearly. Best of luck.
|
The Credit River nonsense (it doesn't merit being called a "decision"), was not only overturned by the Minnesota Supreme Court, they called it an absolute nullity since its inception, because a justice of the peace had no authority to grant that kind of relief. The JP in the case purported to grant equitable relief, and the Minnesota Supreme Court said that it had been illegal for JP courts to do that in Minnesota since 1861.
Don't bother citing it to a court. Just last year someone tried it in a federal district court in California against a bank. The judge told her it was of no precedential value whatsoever and warned her not to beat that dead horse any further.
See other threads for more details.