Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Actual experts? You mean like people who are actual lawyers, and know and understand the law?
Surely you jest, KarenM. You know that all lawyers are just pawns of the Satanists/Jews/Freemasons/Illuminati/insert your favorite whipping boy here.
LOL
|
Don't you mean legal system and not law. Granted the vast majority of the people have contracted into the legal system via the creation of a legal persona thus subjecting themselves to law within a legal framework. The contract is the law.
You can cite cases based on a legal framework all day. It only applies to that particular condition.
However the legal system is not the only law and process . It is a copyrighted business venture incorporated for the purpose of monetizing and skimming funds from the true sovereign parties of interest in any given dispute by means of their respective slave legal personas. Courts prey on human misery as cases are accompanied by acute stress by the parties involved. In comes the lawyer, whose purpose is to financially gain by leaching onto the court process on behalf of one side or another. What is the lawyers usefulness to the now "client" . The only function I see is to make sure the client runs through a pre-programed legal maze and make sure he don't escape.
Client: Lets do blah blah.
Attorney: Well I don't know I don't believe the law will allow that.
Client: Do you mean it's unlawful?
Attorney: No it's not unlawful , but legal precedent such as case blah blah ruled it won't work.
The attorney has set up the fence in which he will confine has clients defense or offense within it. An attorney will not venture out of the legal walls and he will not let his client. Regardless of weather a framework other than a legal one applies.
It is no different than binding arbitration . You have agreed to play by rules a third party invented and to resolve you dispute within it.