Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
"The point", such as it was, was simply that here was a recent decision relevant to citizenship. And it's not exactly a nothing decision; it found fault with the previous decision and that is something useful.
|
Good point Shoonra, it could be useful to 'us'. Of course when a lawyer/attorney speaks, one of us un-skilled know nothings, certainly never know which side of the fence you are playing on except for the fact that as long as you are practicing, you hold a primary allegiance to the court/corporation.
Jerry Carlos
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.
'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.
"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
|