View Single Post
  #14  
Old 05-03-2008, 04:03 AM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,613
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7285304.stm

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
None of which ever actually happened...history is one big myth. Given that these "events" are recorded through the annals of 'judasim' itself, shouldn't the account be suspect just based on the source? It was Paul in the Bible who warned against such fables and stories.

While I cant respond to each date given , some of these jump out as misrepresentations, to say the least:

"Arab Countries 1948". People were moved out of these countries to the new State of Israel directly under the auspice of zionist organizations, following in some cases a series of "arranged" provocations, pressure from the government at the behest of these same forces etc. Many of the people "moved" were not "Jews" in these same sense as those involved in most of the other dates; certainly some judaic beduin tribes from Yemen or Berbers from Morroco are hardly the same people as villagers in 18th century Poland.

"Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia) 1772": Restricted would be a better word, this HUGE area of about one million square miles was already the traditional habitation of the eastern european "ashkenazi" jewish people.

"Nazi Controlled Areas 1938-45": Another zionist effort, where millions of people were grouped and transported to "safe areas" during the war, and many millions more enabled to emigrate. Property was registered accounted and accredited for use; this is the source of the reparations paid after the war.

About one million young, fit "employable" people were 'emigrated' through this system to Palestine, after receving training and formation in a variety of trades skills and technical occupation, as well as military training and armed support. The cooperation between the Nazi and Zionist authorities is well documented.


"Spain 1492" The population of Spain at that time has been documented at about 20% "jewish", mostly in the upper portions of society, especially in the ruling classes. Spain was, and is today, a Jewish country. Some several hundred thousands of people emigrated during this "expulsion" and it's aftermath, taking with them a great deal of property, and leaving the rest as collateral for the debts the Spanish State owed to the international banking system (shades of ww2...) The end result was the next three centuries of wealth transfer to the North of Europe, the financial houses of Holland Italy Rhineland England etc.

Meanwhile over 80% of the 'general jewish element' intermixed with the rest of the population remained, represented in the highest reaches of society- the Church, the nobility, the owning class, etc. Both the "Catholic Kings' Ferdinand and Isabella were of immediate significant 'jewish' extraction, and were surrounded by jewish associates and backers. The entire event was another example of 'social engineering' for some purpose, one of which was to consolidate control over what was then the most powerful country in Europe, and establish the new Empire, which just happened to be born in exactly the same year!
---------------------------------

These are only a few examples but 'where there is smoke there is fire', so I would suspect that history tends to repeat itself. Keep in mind that in every case the working 'difference' between "jews" and "gentiles" has ALWAYS been a legal conversion status- a civil category. Very easy to manipulate and based on something other than mere anthropology.
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 (1845)]
Reply With Quote