Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netwrkranger
This brief by Aksis has me thinking....
I remember when I first came across this brief, I wasn't that interested (due to ignorance), but now I'm pouring over it and really thinking.....
|
Netwrkranger;
Glad it inspired you to some independent thought and study. That is the way. Think for your self. Reason it out. Research.
The word "State" is somewhat high density information.
Someone can say the word "computer" and we may think, "Sure, I know what a computer is.", but then we start getting asked questions about how Random Access Memory works (on it's elemental level), or how to repartition the hard drive in an ext2 format rather then FAT32 or NTFS... and you find that you don't know what a computer
really is, but, most can turn it on and use it and that is sufficient for most things that many want to do.
Some people want to know more and do more. The information comes to us (or we 'dis-cover it') when we need it and can comprehend it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netwrkranger
If the United States is a federal corporation, would not "citizenship" in that corporation, in fact, be an office (employee)? I've never heard of a corporation having citizens.
|
A review of the definition[s] of "UNITED STATE OF AMERICA" and "CORPORATION" from Bouvier's Law Dictionary, you will find that it is,
in fact, a "
political corporation".
You should also be able to see that you have actually heard of
these types of corporations having citizens all your life. Most people just don't know what the State
really is. They seem to imagine it, and have described what they imagined it to be, more like a "bubble" that they were born and live in.
Obviously since being in an "imaginary bubble" would be crazy, that can't be what is really ment by the phrase "in the United States"... it must be akin to saying one is "in the Army" or "in Office".
Like you, I can't say I have ever heard of a "
private corporation" having citizens either. I hope it didn't come off like that's what I was saying.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry Carlos
Makes me wonder why some are called 'citizens' while others are called 'private citizens'. At any rate, it clearly shows that as citizens, the man or woman identified as 'citizen' are "bound" by the laws of that society to which the citizen has his/her membership.
|
Jerry Carlos;
I notice the "citizen" vs "private citizen" a while back as well, and did some speculating as well... just came to the conclusion that it is like the old joke about "military intelligence"...
There are so many paradoxes when we get into any particular Nation State's jurisdiction that I don't care to look to deeply into those 'rabbit holes'... 51mb of 'rabbit hole' is quite a bit of time and energy to find what we already know and has been proven to be true: Voting is a public function.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrg
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I have been looking for this thread.
|
Why?
To call someone names and pick a fight?
Vendetta?
|
mrg;
That's how it feels to me. I believe this is Codee as well.
It's very sad to see him have digressed over the years to such a crude, foul mouthed, neolithic kook.
After reading his first post, I was reminded of this:
Quote:
Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a silent weapon by its creators, but only in its own manner of functioning.
It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of a marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.
It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social life.
Yet it makes an unmistakable "noise," causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with the daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.
...
[People] might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but that is because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, [many] cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, [many] do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.
When a silent weapon is applied gradually, [many people] adjust/adapt to its presence and learn to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up.
Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.
http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml#five
|
It's why he is going to remain on my ignore list. I have already wasted way too much time on the fools strawmen.
The only thing he has proven is that he doesn't love me, that he is not my brother, that he is not my friend, that he is not a co-worker in the Plan of Love and Light, that he is detrimental to the aforementioned, and that the only course left is to cast him out to gnash his teath and weep... as this door I am is now closed to him.
Most Sincerely, and with much Love,
Christopher Theodore: Rhodes