|
obtuseness
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Friendsplacect
But you said Nope meaning that they are not laws without the requisite formalities.
|
Numbskull, the way your question was worded, I took it to mean that you were saying that I was implying that they were statutory laws even though the "requisite formalities" had not been complied with.
Many of you are so obtuse and write so poorly, it's often hard to tell what you mean.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|