Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
Looking at the document appended to DiM's last message, I cringe to think that anyone would be conned into using it.
A "libel of review" is a process used ONLY in maritime cases, and if you look at a map you'll see that the Colorado courts are not likely to have built up a wealth of experience in maritime cases. It's significant that DiM will not provide, even though it would necessarily be a publicly available document, a copy that shows the real names and docket numbers of an actual case -- nor, for that matter, does he dare to show us the court's decision on his pleading. Despite his nice word processing, it's painfully obvious that he never learned the proper way to cite a court decision. And as for the details, a hodge-podge of inapposite and unhelpful quotations and assertions.
|
Quite flattering that Shoonra, wise and experienced
an attorney as he is, cannot follow the Libel of Review. And maybe the newer readers/members here are not familiar with our history, Shoonra and I. So I will summarily kick Shoonra where it counts:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
A "libel of review" is a process used ONLY in maritime cases, and if you look at a map you'll see that the Colorado courts are not likely to have built up a wealth of experience in maritime cases.
|
See the attachment. And take a look at this account sweep that effected a suitor in Oregon - a rural pastor who for not being 501(C)(3) lost his life savings of $75K against a magical $1.5M that he somehow owed the IRS for
not being tax exempt in his rural pastoring!
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/Warrant1.gif
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/Warrant2.gif
Through courts of competent jurisdiction I was faxed the above warrant and contact information about this pastor, within 40 minutes of him getting it from his bank manager who demanded it from Denver by fax. By noon I hear, heads were rolling at the US Attorneys office for faxing that warrant...
Here is the
Verified Statement of Right and warrant in context... Oh wait. This suitor may not have had people like Shoonra, Lawdog and Freebeme in mind when he told me to share his victory over the Internet. I think we were laughing at how his bank shut down his ATM card instructing him to come inside. He thought - "Oh my God; not again??" but got inside to find all his funds were returned to their accounts. The bank wanted him to sign a waiver of indemnity - so that he could never go after the bank for damages. After we got a laugh about that, the bank wrote letters of apology and covered all damages they caused by the seizures.
Now this suitor used a professional trustee named John. John was kind of like Shoonra - disbelieving that such obviously admiralty process could ever issue out of the Mile High City - Denver. He led his other 20 or so clients to attorneys like Shoonra. And after being examined carefully for what they owed in income taxes, they were "fairly" refunded all the stolen funds that they were deemed not to owe.
But then again, without me posting the Verified Statement of Right - which I by the way have posted here many times, you would have to believe me. So note that for all the while I have been posting and linking the Libel of Review, we have Shoonra's first direct commentary about it, in the wake of Lawdog's and Freebeme's blindly hateful rant about me? Interesting timing Shoonra! The readers should know that the entire document can be found with the search engine within two minutes here - but let's see if Shoonra will look around and produce it first, okay??
Regards,
David Merrill.