Quote:
|
Originally Posted by psholtz
I'm quite familiar w/ the Federalist Papers.
I was just wondering which one you had in mind when you made your claim.
You don't mention any of the Federalist Papers in your response above.
|
Ok for instance lets take number 11;
Man, this one is loaded with speech about getting benefits and privileges from Britain and other European governments, it even mentions intentions of a Corporate Enterprise rather then states doing regular business as usual. For something that was suppose to be foreign from the several states they sure did help themselves to the cookie jar in the interest of a Corporation.
Just connecting the dots for you hear due to the fact that the U.S. Corporation was first registered starting the year 1787 a full 2 years before the answer stated in my next entry of this post below.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by psholtz
You're alluding to Social Security and the issuance of SSNs?
|
A freeborn, Sovereign American individual cannot be forced into perpetual debtorship and involuntary servitude, that is, feudalistic performance on behalf of, and for the benefit of, any person, real or juristic, against his Thirteenth Article of Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America. Nor can He be compelled, by Law, to accept, or to give informed consent to accept, an Equitable jurisdiction foreign to his venue.
Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of The United States of America, states in part:
"The Judicial Power shall extend .. . . . to all Cases of Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction; ... . ."
At the very beginning of government under the Constitution , Congress conferred on the federal district courts exclusive cognizance "of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, . . . . . . ; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a Common Law remedy, where the Common Law is competent to give it;. . ." (1 STAT 77, Section 9 (1789))
In another words if your under the private agreement of SSN which is in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, common law is not competent to stand in for your protections.