Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|
True he cannot just come out an declare it, but if through evidence of a administrative process of Notice of Cancellation, and agencies failure to state a claim "PERSONHOOD" upon demand in response in a satisfactory time period then he could have put in a counterclaim for estoppal of personam jurisdiction and claim of right, also demanding remedy for damages/costs.
(Lined has been edited) -->FRCP Rule 9(h) and/or 12(a)(2)