|
Laws of the Universe - Supreme!
Court Corruption Continued
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BOBT12
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
No one whose opinion counts legally agrees.
|
It seems to have mattered to a jury.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
Cryer moved to dismiss his own indictment on these grounds, and the judge denied it. As has every other court that has considered it.
|
Where did I say that I was an attorney?
Quote:
|
Every act [contrary to] a delegated authority...is void. To deny this would affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize but what they forbid. -Hamilton, Federalist No. 78
|
Based on reason was Galileo incorrect? Of course not! Like Galileo I have provided reason, based upon the laws of universal reason, sometime call self-evidence.
The Inquisition wasn't concerned about the truth, they merely wanted to persecute Galileo for making public views they didn't want the in the public domain. The courts today seem to engage in the same practice.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
"The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundation of our conferated fabric. They are construing our constitution from a coordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone. This will lay all things at their feet... We shall see if they are bold enough to take the daring stride their five lawyers have lately taken. If they do, then ... I will say, that against this every man should raise his voice, and more, should uplift his arm ...
"Having found, from experience that impeachment is an impractical thing, a mere scarecrow, they consider themselves secure for life; they sculk from responsibility to public opinion ... An opinion is huddled up in conclave, perhaps by a majority of one, delivered as if unanimous, and with the silent acquiescence of lazy or timid associates, by a crafty chief judge, who sophisticates the law to his mind, by the turn of his own reasoning...
"A judiciary independent of a king or executive alone, is a good thing; but independent of the will of the nation is a solecism, at least in a republican government." --Letter to Thomas Ritchie, December 25, 1820
|
Emphasis added.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Republic Magazine
The Federal Income Tax Scam
Slaying the Beast - Tommy Cryer's win against the IRS, Tax Honesty Movement - a history by Michael Lemieux, Exposing IRS Tactical and Psycological Warfare on Americans- Peymon Mottahedeh, Flex Your Rights, Activist Profile: We the People Foundation, The IRS and the Federal Reserve.. Fraternal Twins - G. Edward Griffin, Joe Banister - His Legal Defense, 60 Sec Activism: Republic Magazine, Constitutional Discipline - 16th Amendment by Michael Badnarik, Tyranny in America - Jeff ****stein, Why an Income Tax is Not Necessary to Fund... - Devvy Kidd, Militia and the Economy - Mark Keornke, No Law! - Marcy Brooks, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and more...
|
Emphasis added.
REPUBLIC MAGAZINE | VOICE OF THE PATRIOT MOVEMENT - REPUBLIC MAGAZINE | VOICE OF THE PATRIOT MOVEMENT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
"the Government does not have the burden of showing the Plaintiffs ‘where’ they are ‘subject’ or ‘liable for’ the tax before the tax is paid. The comprehensive administrative enforcement scheme and judicial review process with which the Government is required to proceed under the IRS code is well established and none of it requires the Government to answer the Plaintiffs’ philosophical questions regarding the tax system.
|
Of course, just as the Inquisition did not have a need to provide a justification for its action.
Quote:
|
As usurpation is the exercise of power which another hath a right to, so Tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right, which no body can have a right to. -John Locke
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
For a clear explanation of ‘where in the law subjects the Plaintiffs to tax,’ the court directs the Plaintiffs’ attention to Amendment XVI of the Constitution and the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 1, which is entitled ‘Tax Imposed.’” Celauro v. United States, 411 F. Supp.2d 257 (EDNY 2006).
|
For the tax indicated in Pollock, perhaps,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by POLLOCK v. FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO., 157 U.S. 429 (1895)
This was a bill filed by Charles Pollock, a citizen of the state of Massachusetts, on behalf of himself and all other stockholders of the defendant company similarly situated, against the Farmesr' Loan & Trust Company, a corporation of the state of New York, and its directors
[…]
It was then alleged that the management of the stock, property, affairs, and concerns of the company was committed, under its acts of incorporation, to its directors, and charged that the company and a majority of its directors claimed and asserted that under and by virtue of the alleged authority of the provisions of an act of congress of the United States entitled 'An act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the government, and for other purposes,' passed August 15, 1894, [b]the company was liable, and that they intended to pay, to the United States, before July 1, 1895, a tax of 2 per centum on the net profits of said company for the year ending December 31, 1894, above actual operating and business expenses, including the income derived from its real estate and [157 U.S. 429, 432]
|
Emphasis added.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
26 USC § 1. If you are about to respond that this section is insufficiently specific, please support your assertions with law having to do with the income tax. Please spare us the cases about abortion and fishing nets.
|
And common sense.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
Others might say "follow the law", but to each his own.
|
The law of the Inquisition?
Quote:
|
Courage is confidence in the face of fear. -Aristotle
|
This is why I really respect Tommy Cryer. He understood that the path was difficult, but he followed his conscience. I am trying to do the same thing.
My heart goes out to many who are being persecuted at the hands of the tyrannical government:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by indago
|
Quote:
TORTURE AMERICAN STYLE
Before the prisoner is put on the bus, he is put in handcuffs and shackles (leg irons). The handcuffs are tightened by a black box that stiffens the chains and puts the wrists in a 90 degree bind that painfully cuts circulation and damages the nerves. It takes several weeks for the circulation and nerves to return to normal. The handcuffs are connected with chains to a waist chain, which is in turn connected by another chain to the shackles which go around the ankles The prisoner can barely move once the shackling process is complete....
But even those who are smart enough to abstain from food and drink, still have to suffer the stench of urine and feces which soon fills the bus or plane.
One other painful aspect of diesel therapy is the shoes that prisoners are forced to wear. They become too small. The cramped position and tight shackles cause the feet and ankles to swell. The shackles cut into the legs and cut off circulation. The blood pools in the feet and causes the feet to swell. The toes are forced up against the tops of the too small shoes, and unbelievable pressure is put on the toenails. The toenails soon become deformed, infected and painful....
After "diesel therapy", Hansen was forced to operate on his feet himself. His toenails were so deformed that they pointed straight up. He could not wear shoes without excruciating pain. The only remedy that was open to him was to pull the toenails out by the roots. Our prisoners of war in SE Asia had their fingernails and toenails pulled out by their torturers. Congressman Hansen had to become his own torturer in an effort to stop the pain.
|
Emphasis added.
Irwin Schiff went through similar treatment in prison. In addition to the "diesel therapy", Irwin was put in a cold cell without clothing. He was probably selected due to the success of his book "The Federal Mafia". This book points out how this government is mostly based upon fear, or tyranny. Of course, state governments play follow the leader, and engage in such abuse. Our own Planetmark and Marksgirl reported similar conduct, little or no clothing, in a cold cell, no bedding, for days on end.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wserra
You know, you make these sweeping legal pronouncements without even attempting to support them by citation.
|
I gave reason, you are the attorney. What law would Galileo give to the Inquisition? Would he be able to cite their previous decisions for his position? Or would he ask them to come to his telescope, and gaze upon the laws of the Universe for themselves? |
__________________
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."
-- Thomas Jefferson
It is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong. -Voltaire
All Rights Reserved.
|