[BOBT12]

Court Corruption Continued

Originally Posted by Equinox

You're welcome, and know the preceding particular piece is not my writing. I do verify content however.



Maybe no judge wants to "be the one" who "does the legally and morally correct thing" which in turn will cause the "system" to have to change. Cause and Effect. However, no matter, change is eminent.

The change will hopfully remove from hiding all the "hidden taxes" that Ron Paul hasn't talked about - Paul talks mostly about the inflation hidden tax. When people see what is REALLY going on, watch for the down size of government and the reduction of prison population - that being the CORRECT thing in a FREE SOCIETY.

The country will also become a quieter place for we will not hear the noises from those feeding from the public trough - (Meaning govt. employees will become fewer and will not be creating work, via the barrel of a gun, and harrassing their fellow man with more rules and regulations that tend only to serve to make government expand while having prosperity, peace and liberty diminish.)

Let us find now those in opposition to correctness offer their thoughts, as has been in past and now, this being a new day, they offer their rebuttal without the use of name calling for it is much like suicide when one begins calling others they don't even know, names. Like casting a stone at the intended target but that target turns out to be the self!

Dear wserra,

Cited below is another case wherein the court disagrees with other courts which in turn causes confusion among the people.


US v. Collins 920 F2nd 619 629 10th 1990

the 16th authroizes a direct unapportioned tax....

So is the income tax a direct unapportioned tax as per the above and Sloan

OR


Is it an indirect tax


OR


Is it only in "the nature of" an indirect tax

Or

Is it all three, any two or just one of the above?


No confussion with court rulings...
I hope you read some of the PRA post and the confussion in the courts and YET it is believed that people are somehow s***bags because they cannot understand what the court cannot explain.