View Single Post
  #359  
Old 05-13-2008, 01:58 AM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 669
sorry, been busy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
All of my traffic research is updated and current in my new research essay. Please click on "PART 1" in my signature line to access my current research.

Thanks you all who contributed.

Cody James of Roberts
AKA Codee
AKA Little Brother 192

Cody:

Sorry I have not been able to comment on your traffic law research. I have two trials (both minor level cases, thankfully!) this week to prepare for, one criminal and one civil.

I will say this: I think you're right about half the time. Which makes you a lot better than DiM aka David Merrill, or the mindless repeater of gibberish, who are wrong 99.9% of the time.

Anyway, have a good week and I will try to give you some feedback next weekend.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote