Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrg
Yes I understand.
Your analogy seemed to suggest that one went into their little private brothel/casino willingly, regardless of whether they knew it was a private for-profit business enterprise, and that what they got was what they deserved for going there.
It is more than a just a brothel/casino when it is becomes a slave market, and when one has been captured and put on the auction block, one has no choice of being there or not.
Your posts are pretty agreeable.
Yeah the Dun and Bradstreet stuff makes you think doesn't it?
|
I believe, that our adversaries, through their own kool-aid training, would and do think that we should know, as 'ignorance of the law is no excuse'. The law if from the creator, and if one is living in a fictional, limited liability, type capacity, then the creator of that fiction will always be more powerful than it's created.
Maybe you or another member can help me with the exact location/quote of this principal:
Anything that goes against the original de jure constitution, is unlawful, and therefore, can be ignored with impunity. If you or anyone can help locate this, I surmise that we should all know this(even if a barrell of a gun is pointed at our temples)......in our adversaries eyes.
And yes, a slave owner would like to think that his slaves are volunteering for the work and contributions he/she makes to the owner. You know, the owner is giving all these benefits such as food, shelter, DISCIPLINE, education. But, this is another topic all in itself.