Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrg
I do not know how your posts are contributing toward a discussion on the term "Natural person" or the word "person". Good luck to you.
|
I noticed something from this thread, and that of several others recently.
That we, sui juris(as the website clearly states) do not believe and follow the religion for statute. We can't, or we get caught up in the merry-go-round of falsehood. We are no longer sui juris when we do. We can't make right from wrong, and we can't bring truth from ficition.
Black's Law 4th SUI JURIS. Of his own right; possession full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability, or the power of another, or guardianship. Having capacity to manage one's own affairs; no under legal disability to act for one's self. The statutory courts require a representation. That is a legal disabililty. One either is one's self, or is not one's self. One is not one's self if one is representing one's self.
A little mind quiz. Have you ever seen your self in a mirror? The answer is no. You have seen a reflection(representation) of your self. If you don't get this point, I am willing to continue elaborating on this specific subject.
CODEE(aka FREEBEME, LITTLEBROTHER 192), LAWDOG, SHOONRA, and any other MEMBER of the bar 'religion', are withing the realm of the PRIVATE CLUB. Their rules are different than ours, and as such, they would like(and this makes it easier for them) us to follow their rules that they must follow.
Another analogy:
As a child, we had more things than some, and less things than others. I thought it was fair to have more than others, but not so fair when someone else had more than me. "Mommy, why can't I have a bigger house, bigger toys, nicer jewelry, etc"?
If I were in the mind-set of the above listed 'persons', then I would think everything that went against what I was taught was complete jibberrish.
Well, guess what, they are following the rules/procedures/policies of the private club. We aren't members, and don't have to follow them. I already know what the response is going to be, and the lovely 'case-law'(opinions) that will attempt to rebut, but will not rebut this simple fact.
We cannot have it both ways, we are either Sui Juris, or we are statutory persons(including, but not limited to state created occupations)