[freedom found]

After reviewing, I found that the hearing was just to answer my question as to the validity of the citation which had been altered after my signing at the time of stop.

It seems the Judge thought my claim was the alteration and thus void, the hearing was to determine if the cite was valid or not under statute.

In my special restricted/answer without joinder and R4C I just wrote, I simply "refused for cause without dishonor" informed the Judge that I am not xxxxx xxxx Defendant, and I understood his offer to hold a hearing was the reason for the BENCH ORDER and required my voluntary compliance, which I refused under duress.

I clarified my first Notice of Conditional Acceptance was just that and his 'consideration' it was a 'motion to dismiss' was not my intention but that it was exactly what it said it was (acceptance for value and return without dishonor of the citation). And I had included a question for clarification, which I have since answerd and "appreciated your offer to hold a hearing to answer my question, but it will not be needed and is hereby respectfully declined and refused, thank you."

I will certify mail it today and see what happens. Thank you all who contributed to my learning and understanding. I will not share this information with others in my trust without testing the premise for myself first. I chose this citation to do it, because I feel confident I could beat it under normal hearing conditions.

If I beat it useing UCC and soverign principles, I will share the information with you and others.

By the way, moishanb, no the envelope was just taped, not sealed.

Peace to all and thanks again! I will keep you updated.