|
Let me tell you guys something..
They had this weird arbitration thing.
The judge announced that there was a lawyer there who worked for free to offer "mediation" to help the parties reach a settlement before trial.
So I went into this little room with the attorney and this other guy and they asked me what my beef was.
I said that there was no proof that we had a contract, plaintiff had not proved SMJ and that I was challenging plaintiffs standing to sue.
He said that the mere fact that cap1 brought a claim against me proved that we had a contract. I was like wow, they might as well close down the law library.
I started talking about SMJ and the fact that plaintiff did not have a copy of the note or anything.
He looked at me like I was from outer space.
I don't think he know what SMJ was, he seemed flabberghasted that anything could be disputed.
Honestly I was glad because I couldn't risk it and I intended to settle anyway but it was really dumb that guy.
|