|
heya moishanb, I am being a little sarcastic and not towards you, the questions are genuine however as I merit your comments.
With concern to procedures, rules, UCC and such I understand that you do not follow the religion of statute, I understand what this means, but where does our volunteering end and a lawful requirement begin? In other words, how does one tell when one has to or one chooses to participate in procedure? I once thought that the difference was with regard to capital crimes of murder or physical damage and such, but now the sophists have included a whole range of crimes under capital crimes which were once commercial crimes.
As far as jurisdiction. I understand that jurisdiction must be asked for in the beginning to avoid their procedure, but what is the beginning? When one is pulled over? I ask this because i surmise that if one asks the police officer who made the complaint to him that I was __________(?) and their is no complaint, end of jurisdiction. I ask this because whether one applies to the religion of statute or not their are traps set to capture us into their legal system.
|