View Single Post
  #92  
Old 05-17-2008, 10:01 PM
moishanb moishanb is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Right here
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by bell
heya moishanb, I am being a little sarcastic and not towards you, the questions are genuine however as I merit your comments.

With concern to procedures, rules, UCC and such I understand that you do not follow the religion of statute, I understand what this means, but where does our volunteering end and a lawful requirement begin? In other words, how does one tell when one has to or one chooses to participate in procedure? I once thought that the difference was with regard to capital crimes of murder or physical damage and such, but now the sophists have included a whole range of crimes under capital crimes which were once commercial crimes.

As far as jurisdiction. I understand that jurisdiction must be asked for in the beginning to avoid their procedure, but what is the beginning? When one is pulled over? I ask this because i surmise that if one asks the police officer who made the complaint to him that I was __________(?) and their is no complaint, end of jurisdiction. I ask this because whether one applies to the religion of statute or not their are traps set to capture us into their legal system.

IMOC(initital moment of confrontation). Everyone is different, and has different temperments, talents, and convictions. I have gotten a reputation in my little town, not unlike others on this forum, by countersuing every purported judge in my area, and going to federal court. Most cops won't even get within a block of me. It obviously wasn't always like this, and took time.

The biggest hurdle for me was embracing the FACT that all courts are private companies, for profit. The only way they can deal with you is by invitation. Once you show up, you have granted personam jursidiction. The pleas, trials, and all other events are simply for show. The mailings from the court are what really creates the contracts. After 3 days from receipt of the court mailing, you are deemed to have accepted whatever the court sent you, unless you decline, refuse for cause, or any other remedy clearly stating NO CONSENT, properly served back to them.

Send me a private email, and I'll share some additional experiences, and my view on this whole 'game'.
Reply With Quote