[aksis]

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

In the highlighted text above (my emphasis) you hit the nail on the head. It is much akin to the old expression of 'wearing two hats'. One for this current situation, and another for that situation involving the "public". Staying out of the 'public' is not even in the equation, as sooner or later, there is going to be the need to go to the store and purchase staples to resupply your pantry.

I simply remain in the 'state of Nature' where ever I am. I live move and have my being in God's Kingdom. To me, it's really that simple.

While some people may debate God's existence, I don't have time and simply refer them to the 'state of Nature' (or to David Merrill, who seems to enjoy the referrals ;-)...

So the presumption that I (or anyone else for that matter) "enters into the public" because of a walk from one part of Earth to another is an impossibility.... in reality.

I suppose there is no harm in "imagining" things (and it can be useful), but if one's imagination leads one to do things to others that they would not want done to them, then there are going to be problems and such action is the essence of crime. That's common sense.

Now, from what I have gathered from the various publications, entering into the employment of a corporation (or like action) is one way to be "in" the corporation.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

I would agree with 'limiting' the amount of involvement with the 'public'.

There is also the way one enters into, or the capacity in which one choose to function in/with the 'public', for example, rather then as a Citizen, it is within our inherent rights to do so in the person of an Ambassador (or the like)... or various other personas.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

I believe Winston Shrout even spoke on this subject in one of his dvds. He said something to the effect of "the old timers used to place a sign on the gates of the city, advising those entering the city what the rules were. Once inside the city, you had to play by their rules. Outside of the city, the minions of the city officials would not bother you.

I find that a posting of the law of cause and effect is not required for it to function, so I don't normally do anything to anyone that I wouldn't want done to me.

What is a "city" other then a "municipal corporation", a "legal fiction"?

These corporations are not "bubbles" that one can be "in side of".... only "in the employment of".

Do employees have to follow the codes, rules and regulations? Ask their superiors...

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 51 > § 1116

(b) For the purposes of this section:
(2) “Foreign government” means the government of a foreign country, irrespective of recognition by the United States.

(3) “Foreign official” means— 
  (A) a Chief of State or the political equivalent, President, Vice President, Prime Minister, Ambassador, Foreign Minister, or other officer of Cabinet rank or above of a foreign government or the chief executive officer of an international organization, or any person who has previously served in such capacity, and any member of his family, while in the United States.

(4) “Internationally protected person” means—
(A) a Chief of State or the political equivalent, head of government, or Foreign Minister whenever such person is in a country other than his own and any member of his family accompanying him; or

(B) any other representative, officer, employee, or agent of the United States Government, a foreign government, or international organization who at the time and place concerned is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against attack upon his person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of his family then forming part of his household.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

I envision the plexi-glass sheet belonging to the government beneath yet another plexi-glass sheet. The sheet at the higher level, being the place of abode where the Sovereigns sit and monitor the actions of the government and how the government interacts with those that are still at ground level and who are unaware of what is really happening. Those that are the sovereign are the ones that will be able to descend onto the second sheet and dictate to the government what is and what is not.

I simply see the base reality. The state is not a "bubble" or "composed" of imaginary layers. I strive to be a realist.

The medaphors are not lost on me, but due to so many people seeming to have sucumb to, what I have at times described as, a group psychosis, I am moved to doggidly hound this point.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

So the question is not really a matter of whether the office is a 'private' or 'public' office, the more important question is whether or not you occupy the office of the 'sovereign'.

I simply don't find calling it "private" to be in line or harmony with the diction. So you won't find me calling it this.

And the point regarding our true and correct capacity is why I didn't feel to split hairs too much on the "public" vs. "private"... it's all foreign to us anyways.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

As I stated in an earlier post. Offices are created when a man or woman move their being into a position wherein a particular function is to be accomplished. Granted, some offices have already been established via the mechanics of the secular law, while there are many untold thousands of offices that have neither been created nor established at this time. An office is not necessarily dependent upon having a geographically fixed placed wherein you conduct the affairs of that office.

Nice points.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

Jesus created the office of "the Christ". He did not have that geographical location fixed by any imagination of man. His office went with Him where ever He went. His office was functional where ever He went. He performed the miracles, spread the Gospel, and did according to His Fathers' will regardless of location.

I have a different perspective on "Jesus" and "Christ"... which is ever growing and changing... but I can appreciate the point regarding the lifestyle and state of mind... where ever we go, there we are.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

In the beginning of your note to me, I could not help but notice the acknowledgment of the 'office' I claim.

First and foremost I recognize all Souls as the Images and Likenesses of God, created by God, and like unto Our Creator, We are sovereign.

All have all been endowed with the ability and right and power to create.

We, the Souls, created bodies. This is unarguably an integral attribute of one's sovereignty - one's "natural autonomous sovereign state" - and the Soul is the sovereign... "the King and the Land are one", and therein is the fulfillment of the quest for the Whole-I-Grail.

Now, you created this "Office" as a tool - "Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ" - I simply recognize your right of creation, and as I have no confirmation from Jesus either way, I simply see the "Ambassador"... I would say, of You, the Soul and your sovereignty (not to contradict you, I am simply clarifying what I am recognizing but not quite what you're presenting... no offence to you or our bro...).

My state has such a person as well, among others.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

Anything and everything that is needed for me to perform my functions on this earth are being provided... If God sees that I need, then He provides.

Our needs, they are supplied. I find this to be true. We even get some of what we want as well.

Service is blessed. Service is love made manifest.

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

Is the office public? No. Is the office 'private'? Yes. It is privately activated between me and God. It is publicly acknowledged by the secular authorities by their actions or inactions. Perception is one of the key factors. If you perceive that the office of 'citizen' is 'public' then it will always remain 'public' but if you perceive it as being an office that God has placed you in, then it becomes a 'private' office.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

I don't find that God placed anyone in the "Office of Citizen". It is the creation of the ego's of men and it is the ego that imagines it, and then imagines it to be "in" this "office"... freewill.

There are always more choices then the ones presented....


Magnanimously,

Christopher Theodore: Rhodes


P.S.

Thanks for confirming that putting Little Brother on the ignore list was a wise choice. The bulk of his posts before I listed him were just insults and baseless contradictions... seems that he remains consistent in this.

Weird how he thinks that any of you people are capable of being brainwashed... or that truth and facts can be used to do this to someone.... and all while he turns to brainwashing techniques like character assassination and repetitive baseless contradiction.