[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by aksis

Jerry;

To get on track with the topic of this thread: "What are your Office hours?"

The answer to that depends upon the office.

It is also dependent upon which is your choice of Kingdom, and who is your Sovereign (if in fact you recognize some entity greater than you).

Originally Posted by aksis

I must object, this presumes facts not in evidence.

The evidence is there if the eyes and mind and spirit are open and receptive.

Originally Posted by aksis

Further, I don't find any Office to be a 24/7 position. You made mention of that regarding Judges in another thread and all I could think about is how unhealthy that would be for people, on the job 24/7??? No.

Ok, here we go: As stated above, it depends on the Kingdom of your choice. Biblically speaking, we find that there were many ‘offices’ established and recorded in the text of the Bible (perhaps many more un-enumerated). The primary requirement of any of those offices are that you maintain yourself as a “Christian” which is a 24/7/365 requirement. An example of this is “Pray without ceasing” 1Thessalonians 5:17 (that example is in context to this subject matter). Is this really an ‘unhealthy’ requirement to be placed on someone.?

Originally Posted by aksis

Further, when 'off duty' (a very common concept), the people holding what ever Office ascend to their proper place, as sovereigns in their correct capacity and joint-heirs to the original estate... Our equals... just another one of the People.

Again: Even Biblically speaking, ‘time off’ as in a ‘day of rest’ was granted, but nowhere does the Bible speak of relieving anyone of their ‘duty’ to perform the responsibilities associated with their ‘office’. I presume in your reference to ‘off duty’, you may be paralleling my analogy of ‘wearing two hats’ and the ‘off duty’ time being that time wherein you are not wearing the hat of one that is doing business with the public. My example, however, points out a responsibility (in context to the primary duty of a Christian) to continue performing the duty whether or not you are ‘off duty’.

Originally Posted by aksis

David Merrill and many others have made the point over and over about the various ways people "appear in [US] person", the example I like the best is the simple act of pulling out the 'STATE' Identification as it is one very common way people step into Office all the time... and thereby become subject to the juris diction.

Again, choice of Kingdom and its’ subsequent laws.

Originally Posted by aksis

Unless people are preforming a public function, like voting, there is no reason one should be using their Citizenship for anything... while at the polls keep in mind that you are in Office and should conduct your self accordingly.

A ‘public function’ is any function that is carried out in the public and has an affect on the ‘public’. These are again terms that are secular in nature and point toward the secular view of things. However, on the other hand, they are also Biblical, in that Jesus, the Christ, went to extreme in teaching each of us by example, how to conduct (perform) our selves in ‘public’.

Originally Posted by aksis

Also, consider the difference between a man/woman 'traveling' via their 'right of Way' in their 'private property' vs. a 'Citizen' 'licensed' to 'drive' a 'motor vehicle' 'registered' in the 'STATE'.

Again, consider that God created all of us with a built in means of transportation that is not dependent upon the more socially acceptable means of transporting our persons and or personal/private property. Subsequently a choice of Kingdom and of the Kingdom laws.

Originally Posted by aksis

Next consider working... unless it's a public function, there is no need to be in Office, but if you're in Office, wouldn't this be acting in the capacity of a 'federal employee'? And isn't a federal employee's 'income' subject to income tax?

As stated above, if you are performing in public, and the performance has an effect on the public, then your performance is in the particular office which you hold. If the laws of the Kingdom of your choice dictate that performing in the public qualifies you as being ‘a federal employee’, then you are a ‘federal employee’. Diplomats and Ambassadors, visiting this country, though ‘performing in the public’ are not and cannot be construed by this nation of secular government as ‘federal employees’.

Originally Posted by aksis

If being summoned before Administrative Hearings, to appear in person, to answer for you actions, were you acting in an Official capacity, and can it be proven that you were? Isn't Admiralty the venue that actions involving State Officers would proceed?

Before those questions can be answered, consider that the Summons spoken of may or may not have any bearing on whether you are required to attend or otherwise respond to the summons. Once again we see a choice of Kingdom, the laws of that Kingdom in relation to this kingdom, and the treaties and or agreements that have been made between this kingdom and the Kingdom that you represent.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.