View Single Post
  #36  
Old 06-06-2008, 07:18 AM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,152
David:

In an earlier posting on this thread, you stated:
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Whereas I have only given my name David Merrill. The remainder of the Information Forms only have information I have to give. No DOB, no SSN, no address, maybe a contact phone #... I always make an offer for the receptionist to take to the doctor and he will almost always accept to examine and treat me for between $50 and $75. Even if I get treatment worth $5K before I leave, we have an agreement in place.

Though I have no proof of this, I presume that yesterday was not your 18th celebration of nativity, and I GUESS that you are close to my age (59).

In the above paragraph, I noticed that you used the term "always" (my emphasis added at the above). Well, as you already know, 'always' is a very long time, both forward into the future and into the past, and even to include the present.

My concern is not so much that you used that term, but rather the implication of its' use. Because of its' far reaching impact (in a chronological sense), this would also infer that even at the age of that 18th celebration, you were then and are still incorporating this knowledge that you possess pertaining to various procedures etc.

If I am mistaken in that construction of your use of the term 'always', then at what point in your chronological existence did you start using the above procedure? Also, at what point in your chronological existence did you exercise some 'procedure' to correct the obvious 'in error' procedures of the past once you realized you had been doing things in error? What procedure did you use to make such corrections of 'in error' dealings of the past regarding those various procedures in which you have deliberated on within this forum?

The reason that I ask these questions, is not to be construed as questioning your integrity, as I admire the information that you present on this forum. IMHO, your views (for the most part are well informed) and beyond my present ability to rebut. Anyway, the reason is that, to my knowledge you have never attempted to set out to public scrutiny the process or procedure you have used in that corrective action. Based upon your current level of knowledge, if that were to be presented, it might make it much easier for the rest of us to be cognizant of a proper procedure to use in performing such corrective actions. Please start another thread for that answer, and to the rest of the participants of this thread, I apologize for the momentary venture into an off-topic area.

Thank you for your consideration.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote