[Jerry Pitts]

You want to accuse me of "taking things out of context", yet you present a scenario that is obviously fragmented and spread across what is conceivably numerous pages and possibly even chapters. The numbered section identifiers are a dead give away that you are not presenting the whole picture, but rather picking and choosing what you want the audience to read. To my knowledge, you have not even cited the name of the document from which these 'quotations' come from.

And You still do not address the issue of the former claims you have made in regard to me and the 'police' or in regard to 'why' you have invited me to this thread.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

Originally Posted by rottweiler

You are taking things out of context again. The irrevocable annexation was absolutely revoked upon the repeated violation of the law, the crown and king went away but the law stayed, the difference is that instead of one king, each one of us are king.

Besides that, what about this?

§ 73. If an uninhabited country is discovered and planted by British subjects, the English laws are said to be immediately in force there; for the law is the birthright of every subject. So that wherever they go, they carry their laws with them; and the new found country is governed by them.

And this.

§ 75. Even as thus stated, the proposition is full of vagueness and perplexity; for it must still remain a question of intrinsic difficulty to say, what laws are, or are not applicable to their situation; and whether they are bound by the present state of things, or are at liberty to apply them in future by adoption, as the growth or interests of the colony may dictate. The English rules of inheritance, and of protection from personal injuries, the rights secured by Magna Charta, and the remedial course in the administration of justice, are examples as clear perhaps as any, which can be stated, as presumptively adopted, or applicable. And yet in the infancy of a colony some of these very rights, and privileges, and remedies, and rules, may be in fact inapplicable, or inconvenient, and impolitic. It is not perhaps easy to settle, what parts of the English laws are, or are not in force in any such colony, until either by usage, or judicial determination, they have been recognized as of absolute force.