Well , I just look at the AG brief. The basis of jurisdiction and ergo state sovereign immunity is the inference that Duff is either a has a statutory duty from being a "person" or a member of the "public"
Quote:
|
The City of Kansas City's municipal court has jurisdiction over Duff and, by statute
|
Quote:
Where two courts have jurisdiction "over a person or particular subject matter
with power to make determination as to the thing in controversy, the court which first assumes that
jurisdiction has the exclusive right to proceed without interference from the second." State ex rel.
Standefer v. England. 328 S.W.2d 732,735 (Mo. App. 1959).
|
Appear as a person and you doomed. Personhood is based on an assumption contract you are acting on behalf of legal fiction a.k.a. being an actor.
Quote:
Plaintiffs claims are also barred by the public duty doctrine. Law enforcement is a duty
owed to the public.
|
Quote:
Public officers are not liable in tort for injuries or damages sustained by a particular
individual resulting from a breach of duty owed to the general public
|
Quote:
Impounding or
causing a vehicle to be towed due to a violation of a municipal ordinance is a duty police officers
owe to the general public.
|
He could have averred both these assumption by oath and the State would need a competent fact witness or sworn affidavit to the contrary.
The law is only competent to act within the scope of the facts on record.
He could have demurred there are no facts on record that are evidence of "personhood or being a member of the "public". Like I said that has to be done by oath.