|
Here's another,
When a citizen is attempting to enforce the Constitution, as herein shown, he is doing so "not for himself alone but also [for others] as a 'private attorney general' vindicating a policy that [the Constitution writers] considered of the highest priority." Newman v Piggie Park Enterprises, 390 US 400; 88 S Ct 964, 966; 19 L Ed 2d 1263, 1265 (1969); Oatis v Crown Zellerbach Corp, 398 F2d 496, 499 (CA 5, 1968); and Jenkins v United Gas Corp, 400 F2d 28, 33 n 10 (CA 5, 1968).
On the flip side, there is this:
States and state officials acting officially are held not to be "persons"
subject to liability under 42 USCS section 1983. Wills v. Michigan Dept. of
State Police, 105 L.Ed. 2nd 45 (1989).
This is why BB has to fire the 'wrongdoer' and return them to the office of 'person' before they can be prosecuted. Which is quite amusing when you think about it. They are found guilty by their peers, before they are cut loose, so their guilt can be determined, by due process, in a court of law. lol
For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
|