Suijuris Forums - View Single Post

James · #3 02-21-2004, 12:59 AM

Food for thought!
>>An exempt W-4&might get&you a&$5,000 penalty charge, even if you write&TDC&or without prejudice&on it.&How are you going to defend yourself if you are charged that penalty?& The new law for frivolous tax forms is&$5,000 not $500.<<<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o

></o

>
Don’t you mean new statute, code, regulation, etc. instead of law?<o

></o

>
$5,000 what? Do they state they would take payment in the proper conveyance of language “Federal Reserve-Notes?” No, they only use the symbol for no-silver ($). Hence, any “payment” demanded, in the form of taxation, fines, etc. to the corporate government could be made in wooden-nickels or grains of sand, etc. Hence, the corporate United States, State or government United States or State enforcing any “payment” for any alleged debt or debt in fact in other than money of account for its coffers, as it were, is an act of treason and an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American people, to wit: Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “No State shall …make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…”<o

></o

>
The body-politic “We the People” can, on the other hand, receive “Federal Reserve Notes” or Federal Reserve-Notes “without prejudice” and protect their rights by so doing. Thus, a reservation of rights and the “Doctrine of Estopple” is exercised inasmuch as “Federal Reserve Notes” are promissory notes and not payment; and few, if any, have gold and silver-Coin in order to pay a debt. <o

></o

>
The government-controlled-schools, however, do not teach the people to protect their rights but instead forcibly teach them to surrender their rights to the de facto government presently in control.<o

></o

>
The now defunct S with two slightly separated parallel-vertical-lines at or near the center of the S means, “silver-bar.” <o

></o

>
&<o

></o

>
>>Please, please, please KNOW what you are doing and WHY you are doing it before you do it!<<<o

></o

>
Also, good advice for those still contributing to the “income tax.” <o

></o

>
>>I should know -- I hired an attorney to help me with my state tax issues and they ignored every letter he wrote.<<<o

></o

>
You hired an attorney? “Please, please, please KNOW what you are doing and WHY you are doing it before you do it!”<o

></o

>
>>How are you going to defend yourself if you are charged that penalty?<<<o

></o

>
Hopefully he/she will learn to be a belligerent claimant of their rights and not defend. For example, in US. vs. Johnson (76 Fed Supp. 538), “Federal District Court Judge” James Alger Fee ruled that, <o></o>
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. It's benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person." McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. [Emphasis added]<o></o>

>>All I'm telling you is that you&must to be&PREPARED.<< 

I agree, just putting in my two-cents.

Nothing-personal JamesDean