[Jerseee]

Forum,

(Especially Kgod) Today I received some very uplifting information from TransUnion (One of the 3 major CRAs).

After a re-investigation of an entry on my commercial person's credit report...they have deleted the child support entry that was on the report! This is not to say that I do not support my child--that has nothing to do with what I am doing. But it does open the door to a very important question....how lawful is a child support order if a major CRA cannot even verify the debt?

This is major!!! I hope all of you can comprehend just what happened. I told all 3 CRAs to verify the debt. One did not answer (Equifax), One said that it was valid (Experian), and the other has deleted it (transUnion). So do you know what that means? Well if not.........

According to the code, they all must be reporting the same information (if it is valid and verifiable). Since one has said the order was valid and the other said that it was unverifiable well then......."Houston we have a problem"!

The fact that one of the major 3 cannot verify any alleged debt is testimony on your behalf because they will delete the entry within 30 days!!! And TransUnion did just that after a RE-INVESTIGATION. So that means they investigated the entry atleast twice!

Which means that it is unverifiable! A court order unverifiable?!? A court judgment unverifiable? This has raised massive questions within myself that I do not know where to begin (because of the excitement and joy).

So if Jim, Ice, OT, Sui Juris, James or anyone out there with some or extensive knowledge about judgments/court orders, please chime in before I get plastered and come home on the milk truck.

This is a huge victory if it can be explained. And if can be explained somehow, i may have a tort claim against Experian for publishing and providing false and misleading information, according to the code! US code 15, chapter 41, subchapter III.