View Single Post
  #7  
Old 02-08-2005, 03:06 AM
sfergnel sfergnel is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 67
But Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Smith
Those UCC 1-207 disclaimers NEVER work anyhow. Urban legend.
And before you trash me, show me a proven instance where they have worked to avoid anything.


If these disclaimers NEVER / DON'T work, then why would the DMV prohibit their being used as part of an individual's signature?

This incident gave me further proof that we are indeed living in a "MATRIX"!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kgod999
i wouldnt go there. i wouldnt place myself in harms way of the government unless i was forced to by them first.


kgod,

I disagree. I believe that it is better for them to confront the beast now, so that if they run into trouble "driving", I could be there to help them navigate "Legalland". That way, when they come of age, they will be better prepared to handle BB in a matter befitting a sovereign. The right way!!


scottinalaska,

As I stated, the only reason that I agreed to allow them the opportunity to have the learner's permit, was so that I could forestall having to explain to them about our "MATRIX" existence.

Now that I know they can NEVER have one "legally" (to use the word loosely), I have been allowing them to practice as if they did have one, and in the very near future, I myself will grant them one using examples I have found on this site.
Reply With Quote