Information, Presentment, or any "mail box policy" stands as truth if not rebutted. All Legislated Statutes should be treated as rebutable presumption and harmful to in-personam citizenship. Matters not what agency activity the individual is involved within, jurisdiction can be challenged at any time. "Without prejudice' UCC 1-207, will stand as rebuttal, 'answer' and 'discovery' 'prima facie' on the Administrative record as notice to 'abate." Any of the above creates "estoppel of agency', when the issue lacks 'in-personam" jurisdiction. There will be "no cause where relief may be granted" to agency at the administrative level. Agency gets into much mischief if it attempts to raise a "dead in Law" issue, without assent.

"Remedy" is final within The Uniform Commercial Code. We the People were given "limited liability," due to the usurpation of Constitutional 'lawful money." Government hath not the power to repeal The Bill of Rights, even at statute Civil Liberties. Government activity only creates the allusion of sovereignty by our birth in a corporate State hospital per certificate and unconditional contract. A Citizen makes himself subject to the 14th Amendment public policy by waiving their individual rights on the very forms they fill out on any given day. These forms serve as an Affidavit in personam, because the negotiable units are signed under penalty of perjury. A representative statement vitiates 'promise' to appear in any capacity at the presumptive agency tribunal. Unless rebutted, these contracts serve as "certified' fact on the Administrative Record before the tribunal at bar, with your 'unconditional' 'in-personam' (Fed. Rule 12. b) 'writing." Your choice was "taxation without representation' for you did not avoid consequences of an 'unconscionable, 'unconditional" and now negotiable unit. Your tithes are in the synagogues of a de facto Master and our Lord is not pleased.

The Article I "inferior court', district attorney and your lawyer will only follow the procedures set forth by the record. Your representative should be on the record as 'without prejudice'. If you do not rebut, the 14th Amendment of Article I 'inferior' court will try facts and subject matter only with a 'fair and impartial jury', rather than 'peers' trying 'fact and law' of Article III. The district attorney will not be sworn by 'Thee People' at Article II Executive to follow the 'Public' Law at Calif. Code 22.2, he will follow The State of California at Federal 'public policy'. Your attorney does not know "state" Citizen Rights, only federal 'forum' 'persons' procedure of the Tribunal per the Code of Military justice, which has been 'adopted' by most states.

Jurisdiction must be challenged at every issue to keep the controversy at the administrative level. The two required jurisdictions of 'personam' and 'subject matter' will not be served in the same court, unless it is Article III. A prayer to equity must only reap equity.

A commercial Tribunal must be dealt with commercially, the court must be bound to subject matter only and the Citizen must retain his 'personam'. Your personam is 'common Law' at Bill of Rights, not equity, unless you failed to reserve your Rights.

The rule still stands, if you are challenged by equity, you must answer with equity. "Without prejudice" UCC1-207 is Remedy because the 'representation' in-personam reveals the 'discovery' that no Rights were thereby waived at Bill of Rights.

UCC1-103.6 is equalizer via equity and notice, now the code must be read in harmony with the common Law at Cal. Code. 22.2. This section of the UCC is the only place the Constitution and equity may be joined without 'contempt' of tribunal.

A court which presumes you will appear, cannot issue a criminal warrant for 'failure to appear' at corporate bar. 'Without prejudice', written above your 'writing' at UCC 3.104.1, destroys its "unconditional" requirement at UCC 3-104.2 and 'promise' is forfeit at UCC 3-104.3. It serves as a bar to all others at 'Obligation of Contract' that a 'condition' is prima facie upon the unit and it is utterly void at Law.

It is 'proclivity of your adversary not to answer', so do not expect agency to give you any information on the above material.

Stand your ground as intended when facing an adversary.

Agency may play 'ignorant' and use 'mail box policy'

ANSWER EVERYTHING.

Force agency to write down their issues and mail them to you. Letters are the best facts and each failure to answer on the part of agency is further 'estoppel.'

Phone calls are 'parol' and courts will offer you a 'parol' chance to explain yourself for 'dishonoring' agency presentment by 'creditable' agency phone call.