note, that, in their definitions of person, individual, and&natural person they used the terms person & individual freely and interchangeably considering the term being defined.& thus they cross-reference each other without clearly defining each.&


isn't it a common maxim of definitions that a word cannot be used to define itself?


also, terms like "living, flesh-and-blood human being" are NOT used to define "individual" nor "person."


am i off base here?


jon