[Jerseee]

rushpat,

That is part of the end game. Good job on the research. That is a key weapon. And remember, I have always said to cite the code in your docs to the CRAs. There is power in the codes but, what I am doing is this:
1. Using and noticing them of the code
2. using the CRAs as an investigative agency
according to the code
3. CRAs results are my evidence of their
investigative findings
4. Their findings are according to the code and
testimony that the debt is fraudulent

That is why it is important to me to get the CRAs involved. Yes the VoD is a tool but, it will not give you the evidence you need against the alleged creditors. The results of the investigation by the CRAs (a public agency providing FREE investigative work) is a greater piece of fire power to have if you have to go to court.

Think about it. Creditors pass on fraudulent information to the CRAs month after month, day after day, damaging folks and their ability to get consideration through their strawman. But once you have the CRAs expose them and delete the unverifiable information....not only has the debt been voided when you send the VOD but, you got the creditor up against the wall by passing fraudulent informaton to the public to damage you commercially. Can you say a libel law suit? An excellent tort IMHO.

Is there anyway you can post the cases?