Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kgod999
i saw a post at another forum bearing this title and gave it some thought. im aware of the fact you can fire a district attorney or any other attorney who interlopes on your contract, or, fire a district attorney who refuses to protect your rights. this applies to a judge also. he has a contract with you (his oath of office). accept his contract with another contract and inform him that he is to work for you, and tell him his oath is his bond from you (the people), then, he is indemnified and has to obey you. now, you set up and tell him what he is gonna do for you and fire him the moment he steps outside those boundaries. On a side note, if they ever accuse you of threatening a judge, tell them to produce one, they are all government employees. peeace.
|
I must chime in here and be the devil's advocate.
I am challenging this view of "contracts" between the defendant and judicial actors. An oath is not a contract. Contracts have particular qualities that makes them such. Please support your statement that an oath is a contract.
Also, please elaborate on this notion of "firing" a judicial actor. Is this idea dependent on the idea that there is a contract betwix the two of you?
-BT